The knowledge demonstrated try accumulated in the context regarding larger look tactics, hence contains an in depth sociodemographic and you will relationships review, and also other balances during the extent out-of close relationships
Depending waplog on the total lifetime of the relationship, the common, in years, with the different statuses revealed try, respectively: 2.89 (SD = 2.27); cuatro.94 (SD = 2.97), both organizations differing ranging from six months and eleven numerous years of relationship; 7.76 (SD = 4.01), between a few and you will 19 ages; and you will (SD = 4.82), anywhere between lower than a-year and you will 31 years. 8%) and you can lived that have family relations, if you are those people coping with the partners was primarily performing someone (69.2%), of which 53% had university otherwise postgraduate degree. Of the certified union players, 67% had college or post-graduate amount, where 89.8% was in fact operating, 2% retired and 8.2% out of work. The functional situation towards the partnered professionals try similar: 89.5% have been operating, dos.9% had been resigned and you may six.3% have been out of work, and you may step one.3% referred some other work status. In this category, 62.5% of users got college or postgraduate values.
Private connection is evaluated according to Portuguese variation (Dining table 1) of your less sort of the brand new Perseverance Scale (Stanley, 1986), which was translated according to the following translation and you can retroversion steps: immediately following consent got by journalist, the initial level was interpreted of the a few experts in industry, both of these translations was indeed exposed to retroversion by a couple masters, one to bilingual plus one proficient in the usage of the English language; eventually, per type is compared to unique scale, opting for the utilization of this new terms and conditions and you can products that have greater proximity so you’re able to they. New Portuguese version ergo consisted of new fourteen new items and the same respond to size and you can try named, shortly after deliberation because of the group, the private Commitment Size (‘Escala de- Compromisso Pessoal’–ECP). With the finally stage of your translation techniques, new software was applied to 3 players into goal of confirming the newest adequateness of language in addition to unambiguous understanding of what exactly, that happen to be chatted about into people just after application of brand new survey. As there was basically zero statements claiming or even, the things remained the same.
Due to an up-date of the brand-new Davis (1996, cited from inside the Lind, 2008) scale, that it appliance is meant to size dating quality feeling, with the hope one to, with regards to the theoretic presumptions, both scales will undoubtedly associate
Relationship Quality, chosen to verify criteria validity, was measured with the Relationship Rating Form–Revised (RRF-R; Davis, 1996, adapt. by Lind, 2008). The items are presented in the form of questions that the subjects will answer according to a rating scale of 1 (not at all) to 9 (completely or extremely). The Portuguese version consists of a total of 46 items grouped in four dimensions: Passion, Confidence, Conflict and Intimacy. The RRF-R revealed psychometric properties ranging from good to excellent, obtaining an excellent internal consistency at the total scale level, with Cronbach’s alpha values between .97 and .98, for women and men respectively, and .81 and .97 at subscale level, a good temporal stability (significant correlations ranging between .70 and .87; p < .01) and high concurrent validity with a marital satisfaction scale (significant global score correlations between .88 and .85, for women and men respectively; p < .01). In the current sample, the RRF-R presented for the total scale, an excellent Cronbach's alpha of .96; .94 for the Passion subscale, .93 for Confidence, .77 for Conflict and .83 for Intimacy. The internal consistency of the total scale remained excellent for the four subsamples: .95 for participants in a dating relationship, .94 for those in a dating relationship with cohabitation and .97 for participants in both formal unions and married relationships.